Home / Government / Commission to ponder downtown building heights again

Commission to ponder downtown building heights again


Safety Harbor City Commissioners will again ponder how high buildings in a small portion of downtown should be when they meet next on Monday night.

Monday’s meeting will begin at 7 p.m. Here is the link to the agenda, with additional material, known as “backup,” available via the hyperlink on each item: http://safetyharbor.granicus.com/GeneratedAgendaViewer.php?view_id=6&event_id=1632.

The current Commission has twice before discussed reducing the maximum height in the city’s Community Town Center zoning area, or  “CTC” for short, which runs roughly two blocks west from the Safety Harbor Spa on Main Street and a few blocks north and south, and is intended to house the city’s most intense developments. The zoning classification has a maximum building height of 45 feet, which is roughly the height of the zone’s two cornerstorne buildings – the one that houses Barfly and Starbucks and the one across the street that houses an assisted living facility. The zone also is home to a mixed-use complex under construction that will top out at 40 feet when finished. That development, which will house Bay to Bay Properties’ headquarters, a restaurant, a tavern and luxury apartments, caused some controversy when Commission approved it last year.

This property, under construction in the Community Town Center zoning classification, will have a maximum height of 40 feet when completed. (Scott Long)

There are only three undeveloped parcels remaining in the CTC that don’t have approved site plans, so any change in building height would affect only those three parcels and any already-developed parcels if they are redeveloped in the future. Additionally, changing the city’s Downtown Master Plan, which any change in maximum height requires, is a lengthy process that also involves Pinellas County, and any development site plans that are approved before that roughly seven-month process is complete could build to the current 45-foot height maximum.

City staff will ask Commission for feedback on two options to reduce the building height:

  • Reducing the maximum height to 35 feet and no more than three stories
  • Reducing the maximum height to 35 feet and no more than three stories, but allowing the third story to be a maximum of 40 feet if it is setback at least 10 feet from the second story.

Commissioner Nancy Besore originally raised this issue and supports the first option, while Mayor Joe Ayoub has suggested the second option as a way to encourage developments to have some variation in design to avoid a so-called “canyon effect” of taller buildings.


Land Development Code changes: Commission had previously discussed a number of changes to the city’s Land Development code, the largest being to require that property be replatted before one structure was built over two adjacent properties under common ownership. When first proposed, Commission wanted language added that exempted existing buildings over two properties from having to be replatted. The city’s Planning & Zoning Board approved the new language but is suggesting that Commission consider a slight change that would remove the above exemption if the current building is voluntarily demolished in order to create two separate buildable lots.

Harbour Pointe West development extension: The developers of the proposed Harbour Pointe West development are asking Commission to grant a one-year extension to the site plan that was approved last year. Harbour Pointe West, which is at the corner of 2nd Street South and 2nd Avenue South, is proposed to house four single-family detached townhomes, 12 condominiums and retail space.

Annexation repeal: Yee-Chun Tre Kapusinsky last year asked Commission to annex into the city property he owns at the corner of State Roads 580 and 590 for a proposed development. Commission approved the annexation, but it was later determined that the legal description of the property was inaccurate and additional hearings would be required to annex in all of the property. Kapusinsky no longer wishes to annex the land into the city, so this proposed ordinance would reverse the previous approval.

Holiday Parade grand marshals selection: Commission will vote on the annual grand marshals, who will preside at the Holiday Parade on Dec. 15 and the holiday tree-lighting on Dec. 7. Nominations have been received for longtime Kiwanis volunteers Paul & Kathy Bryan and Scott & Laura Long, who created this year’s Melons for Moolah Guinness World Record event, but Commission is free to select whomever they wish.

Consent agenda: Items expected to have little debate, such as approval of the last meeting’s minutes and most contracts, are included en masse in the consent agenda, though any Commissioner can ask for any item to be considered separately. This meeting’s consent agenda includes buying three new pickup trucks and disposing of three old ones and approval of Downtown Partnership Grants to Copperheads Tap House and Tonicity.


Attend the meeting: The meeting starts at 7 p.m. at City Hall, 750 Main St. Meetings typically run from 1.5 to three hours. Residents are given the opportunity to speak on all agenda items, except for presentations and consent agenda items. Come forward when asked by the mayor, state your name and address, and you’ll be given three minutes to address the Commission. For any issues not on the agenda, or any item that is on the consent agenda, residents get three minutes to speak at the beginning of the meeting during “Audience to be Heard.”  

Watch from home: Meetings are live-streamed to the city’s website at http://cityofsafetyharbor.com/557/Streaming-Media. The following day, a video of the meeting is posted for residents to watch.

Contact your Commissioners in advance by leaving them a message at City Hall at (727) 724-1555 or emailing them:

Mayor Joe Ayoub – jayoub@cityofsafetyharbor.com

Vice Mayor Carlos Diaz – cdiaz@cityofsafetyharbor.com

Commissioner Cliff Merz – cmerz@cityofsafetyharbor.com

Commissioner Andy Zodrow – azodrow@cityofsafetyharbor.com

Commissioner Nancy Besore – nbesore@cityofsafetyharbor.com


  1. Exactly, Mr That Guy. You might also add conflating “quaint” with blight. As long as nothing changes, those same people won’t say a word about a dilapidated vacant rat infested home, but once the building comes down, 100 rats running for their lives, only then do they speak up, to inquire about the new home “some developer” might be building. True story by the way, even the 100 rats. And then there is all the parking and traffic fears, even voiced by a couple commissioners, totally ignoring the data and the facts presented to them by the zoning board study or actual examples and expertise presented by professional planners. So we might actually be changing the often ignored Master Plan because of a few Henny Pennys and some elusive chicken little neighbors, rarely ever seen patronizing Main Street. And let’s stop giving credence to the term “canyon effect.” That’s just NOT a thing. We are talking about 45 ft buildings. It is a downtown Main Street, and only a few blocks at that.

  2. 35 feet?! That would be the most pitiful downtown area I’ve ever seen. What is with this city and its extreme phobia of multi-story buildings… as it is this city’s downtown area makes Bartow look like New York City! 45 feet is still puny low-rise buildings, and arguably much too short for the city’s highest-density development zone. The people advocating FURTHER reduction of the building heights seem to be conflating “quaint” with underdeveloped, and don’t seem to understand the most basic concepts of urban planning. They also evidently don’t know much about the history of Safety Harbor, since it had more of a skyline in the 30’s with a population of <1000 than it does now with a population of 17,600. We've got people running entire campaigns on promises to suffocate downtown even more than it already is, and then everyone acts like it's some big mystery why main street is deserted for all but 4 hours a month.

  3. I was reading the Huffington Post and came across an article about dolphin trainers manually stimulating dolphins.

    Do the trainers n Tampa and Clearwater practice this technique too? I would like to see a resolution condemning this criminal and unnatural practice.

    Dolphins cannot consent. If there’s no consent, it is rape.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This div height required for enabling the sticky sidebar
Ad Clicks : Ad Views : Ad Clicks : Ad Views : Ad Clicks : Ad Views : Ad Clicks : Ad Views : Ad Clicks : Ad Views : Ad Clicks : Ad Views :